Yesterday my Bidvertiser experiment was upgraded to debacle status, now I'm upgrading it to 'balls' status. In case you can't be bother reading yesterdays post, basically Bidvertiser accused me of generating 'invalid' clicks, which is how they justified the 1 in 10,000 click through rate. According to them, only one click was deemed to be valid (a $0.03 click mind you). I fired back a response asking them to explain how it was possible for me to generate invalid clicks when I knew without a doubt that I'd done nothing wrong. I also asked them on what ground the clicks I generated had been found to be invalid.

Here's their complete un-edited response:

Invalid clicks can also be recorded by robotic scripts and spam clickers which engage in fraudulent activifty without the owner knowing about it.
Your account's status will remain under observation in the upcoming future and if problems would be detected you will be notified.

So robotic scripts and spam clickers are the ones doing all the ad clicking apparently? Freakin' bizarre! I know I'm cynical, but I can't help but wonder if this is the standard line used to short change publishers?

Hopefully in the 'upcoming future' I'll get a response that is in some way informative and satisfactory.

While I wait, it's poll time! I haven't done a poll for a while, so here we go...

What's more important, post frequency or post length?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Ahhh... scientific and statistically insignificant poll...