Battle of the content links

I've been using Kontera content links on a few sites for some time now, and whilst they haven't exactly set my little money making world on fire, they have proven to be a slow and steady little earner. Up until recently I'd been under the apparent misapprehension that Kontera were the only player in the content links market, but apparently I was wrong. After some research in forums I found that there was quite a bit of buzz surrounding Infolinks, with people suggesting they paid better than Kontera. Being a natural born sceptic, I decided to take a look myself.

So here's what I did. I ran Kontera on this site for five days, then switched to Infolinks for five days. Here's what I found.

Kontera (18-23 November 2008)

Total revenue: $1.83
CTR: 1.70%
CPM: $0.35

Infolinks (25-30 November 2008)

Total revenue: $3.16
CTR: 1.45%
CPM: $0.54

Kontera links seem to load up slightly quicker than Infolinks, but based on the figures above, Infolinks have the edge in terms of CPM. Kontera seem to have the edge when it comes to reporting, and I have multiple sites setup with Kontera, whereas I'm not sure how to add sites to my Infolinks account (I haven't discovered if that option exists). Both companies have a $100 minimum payout threshold, so there's no difference there.

I may try the same experiment on one of my other sites to see if the results are the same... if I can figure out how to track individual sites with Infolinks that is.