England and umpires versus Australia: Ashes 2nd Test 2009
I can't pick up a paper, turn on the TV or listen to the radio without having to hear about the Australian finale of Master Chef, and quite frankly I'm sick of it. As an Aussie I have far bigger issues to deal with, like the daylight robbery currently being committed against our cricket team in England.
The second Ashes test being played at Lords has been punctuated by one umpiring blunder after the other. While Michael Clarke and Brad Haddin have put Australia within striking distance going into the last day of play, England are just another dodgy umpiring decision away from taking the win.
When Clarke and Haddin got together the score was 5 for 128. Not a good looking score card, and even worse when you consider that 3 of those 5 wickets should never have been given out.
Exhibit A: Simon Katich
Simon Katich is given out off what is clearly a no ball. Andrew Flintoff clearly over stepped the mark, the umpire missed it, game over for Katich. In fairness it was probably a poor shot for Katich to have played, but still, there's no way he should have been given out.

Exhibit B: Phil Hughes
Phil Hughes edged a ball to slip, at which point England captain, Andrew Strauss claimed a "dubious" catch. By dubious, I think the commentators meant, "the ball hit the ground before it was picked up by Strauss". The replay really tells the story. Rather than refer the decision to the third umpire, as happened in England's innings, and after some argy bargry, the umpires decided they'd just send Hughes on his way. Bottom line, terrible decision and terribly inconsistent piece of umpiring.

Exhibit C: Mike Hussey
If there's ever a batsmen that needs a bit of luck to go his way it's Mike Hussey. I'm not sure that there is a batsman going around at the moment that can stake a claim to Hussey's title of "Batsman dismissed most due to umpire error".
In his latest stroke of bad luck, Hussey was given out caught behind even though he didn't touch the ball with his bat. Countless replays, using all the technology at hand, super slo-mo, "Hot spot" and "Snicko", showed the same thing. Hussey's bat hit the ground, while the ball skidded through without hitting anything.

Thankfully Clarke and Haddin made it through to the end of the day's play and gave the Aussies a fighting chance. I'll be tuning in tonight to watch the conclusion, but I hope that the outcome is decided by the players and not by dodgy umpiring decisions.
Rate it
Filed under: Television
Tagged: cricket
Social Networks: Facebook, Twitter, Google, del.icio.us, StumbleUpon, Digg, Reddit, Posterous.
Semi-related posts
6 Responses to “England and umpires versus Australia: Ashes 2nd Test 2009”
Leave a Reply
Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.









there is tingling that the ashes will head to blighty and all i can think about is chk chk boom!
Terrible umpiring. Now that the verdict of the match is given, it can be concluded that Australia did not loose match to england.
IT IS UMPIRES DUO who won for England. Come on Team, wrap up your sleeves and ensure that umpires do not do it again.
Rudy, Are you trying to ensure that South Africa reaches to top in Test sides by giving wrong decisions against Australia… You should quit. Even my grand mother can do a better umpiring than you
Looks like when things start going against the aussies, they start whingeing as well. What happened to “hard n fair”?? Discarded in Steve Waugh’s dustbin, i suppose.
and yeah, one more thing…re-visit sydney 08 as well. it might end up bolstering ur morale if nothing else.
There’s nothing wrong with playing hard and fair prashant. If the test had been played hard and fair there’d be no problems. There was nothing hard nor fair about they way Hughes, Hussey and Katich were given out though.
To be fair, and in an attempt to be unbiased, Australia were outplayed by England during days 1,2,3 and 5. Day 4 though they were well and truly outplayed by the umpiring. The fact that they got so close to stealing the game even though 3 of their top 4 batsmen were given out when they shouldn’t have been should give the Aussies hope for the remaining 3 tests.
Don’t really know too much about this “sport” but the shear thought of throwing an object that fast sounds to good to disappoint.